Who will be the winner in the Champions League final: forecast and analysis of the May 30 PSG – Arsenal game

The winners of the parliamentary elections in Hungary are already known, and the audience will find out who will prevail in the Champions League final in Budapest on May 30. The reigning champions of their respective leagues, PSG Paris and Arsenal London, will face off in the main match of the season. Mikel Arteta's tactics, Kvichi Kvaratskhelia's factor and the game's pattern are in the Izvestia material.

How did PSG go through the last rounds?

PSG's quarterfinal against Liverpool turned out to be significant in the score: Luis Enrique's team won 2-0 at home and then again 2-0 at Anfield, closing the series with a total score of 4:0. For such a stage, this is almost an ideal scenario: two dry wins over a top-level opponent and not a single goal conceded. over the course of two matches.

The semi-final with Bayern Munich was already completely different in the picture. There, PSG had to maintain a very high tempo and constantly exchange chances: 5-4 in Paris, then 1-1 in Munich and a total of 6:5 in favor of the French club. This is a fundamentally important contrast: PSG has shown that they can achieve results both through tight control and through a very nervous, opening game.

Arsenal's pragmatic path to the final

Arsenal's road to the final looked more restrained in score, but very recognizable in style. In the quarterfinals, Mikel Arteta's team beat Sporting 1-0 away and then played 0-0 at home, closing the match with a total score of 1-0. It was the most rational series possible: a minimum of missed opportunities, a minimum of chaos, a maximum of risk control.

The semi-final against Atletico also followed the same logic, only with a little more pressure. Arsenal played 1-1 in Madrid, and then won 1-0 at home, going on with a total score of 2:1. Arteta separately said in a post—match interview that the second leg was "special" for the club and that reaching the final was both a moment of happiness and relief - it conveys the nerve of the team well..

Safonov, Vladimir: how did our goalkeeper beat Donnarumma

The Russian has achieved the performance of one of the best goalkeepers in world football

Drawing of the teams' game

Formally, both teams start from 4-3-3, but the meaning of these schemes is different. PSG's outfield defenders Ashraf Hakimi and Nuno Mendes are constantly rising so high that they turn into additional attacking players. Vitinha and Joao Neves set the pace, and PSG have several players ahead who can create a dangerous episode individually. As for Kvaratskhelia, he is equally dangerous when he moves to the center and when he rushes behind defenders, and Luis Enrique also added hard work without the ball to his game.

Arsenal works differently. This is also a team about possession and positional culture, but it has a different emphasis: first control of space, then control of the ball, and only then — risk and an attempt to create a moment. Arteta's team is almost impenetrable in defense, it is dangerous by standards and at the same time capable of scoring from a variety of zones and different performers. Reuters adds another definition: Arsenal is based not only on control, but also on pragmatism. It's normal for this team to win a dirty match, it's normal to live 0-0, it's normal not to open up for the sake of beauty. That is why all the talk that Londoners are supposedly "only defending themselves" looks superficial: they are not closing down, but spreading the risk.

It is also very revealing how Luis Enrique describes his opponent before the final. He doesn't talk about opposing styles, but admits that Arsenal also grew out of positional football and are generally similar to teams that want to own the ball and impose their structure. But at the same time, the PSG coach calls the Londoners the best defensive team in Europe and highlights their strength by standards. This is perhaps the most accurate formula for the final: not "romantics" and "pragmatists" will meet, but two elitist organized teams, one of which is stronger in open head—to-head football, and the other in matches where every episode must literally be gnawed out.

Egyptian Power: Salah and company will check out the Russian national team

Valery Karpin's team will meet with one of the participants of the World Cup, and talent from Manchester United will get a chance to prove themselves

How will PSG and Arsenal play in the final?

The key to the game lies not in abstract "beauty", but in who sets his own pace. If the final opens up, if there are long passages, if PSG gets space for the jerks of Dembele, Douai and Kvaratskhelia, the advantage will rather be on the side of PSG. If Arsenal manages to make the game more viscous, break the tempo into episodes, squeeze the opponent into positional attacks and get their standards, Arteta's team's chances will increase dramatically. This is a familiar environment for Londoners: they have already won in the playoffs this way - through a minimum score, through discipline, through patience.

There is also a personnel intrigue that can greatly affect the match pattern. The participation of Dembele and Hakimi in the final is in doubt, and Arsenal is missing Ben White. This means that the flanks — especially the right flank of the Londoners and the right edge of the Parisians — become, perhaps, the central point of the entire game. Therefore, the most likely scenario seems like this: PSG works more often through the ball and width, Arsenal responds more often with structure, pressure and standards.

The Anointed King: how the goalkeeper brought Spartak victory in the Cup

The goalkeeper of the red and white again came out before the penalty shootout and won it.

If the finale really follows this logic, the audience will not see fireworks for the sake of fireworks, but a tense, tactically intense game where one moment can decide everything. The match starts this Saturday at 19:00 Moscow time at the Puskas Arena in Budapest.