Unholy deeds: Orthodox Christians continue to be persecuted in Estonia
The UN drew attention to the persecution that the Republic of Estonia is bringing down on local Orthodoxy. However, the state has not yet fulfilled its threat to the Estonian Orthodox Church to ban it if it does not agree to completely sever canonical ties with the Moscow Patriarchate. But the ruling coalition intends to tear the local Orthodox away from Moscow at any cost. In the meantime, the Estonian special services are deporting those church leaders who have been deemed "disloyal" and "a threat to state security." The details are in the Izvestia article.
The UN suddenly woke up
Recently, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights reported systematic violations of human rights in Estonia, including in the religious sphere. The review prepared by this agency includes a summary of an earlier report by the Geneva-based human rights organization Justice pour Tous Internationale ("Justice for All") on the discriminatory policy pursued by the Estonian authorities against the canonical Orthodox Church. Human rights activists pointed out that Estonia's application of the law on State security against the church is of "deep concern." It is noted that the Estonian state has introduced amendments to its legislation, which made it possible to criminalize belonging to canonical religious denominations objectionable to it.
As noted in Justice for All, this policy reached its climax in the amendments to the Law on Churches and Parishes of June 18, 2025, which prohibited the maintenance of spiritual ties with foreign religious organizations considered a "security threat." According to these amendments, religious communities can now be de-registered without trial, which is equivalent to a ban. "The historical Church faced the expulsion of its leadership and the threat of dissolution: all this was justified by national security considerations. In particular, the Estonian Orthodox Christian Church (EOCC) continued to face constant repression from legislative, administrative and executive authorities," the authors of the document note.
Human rights activists claim that the Russian-speaking minority in Estonia continues to be "systematically marginalized" in various fields, including religious issues. "In particular, religious institutions that provide spiritual care to Russian—speaking communities have been persecuted," Justice for All states. They point out that in order for Estonia to fulfill its international obligations regarding the rights of national minorities, it is necessary to stop a large-scale campaign against the EHRC, including expulsions, refusals to grant residence permits and exclusion from consultations on church policy. The report highlights: "The restoration of canonical leadership and the protection of the autonomy of the Church are necessary so that religious identity is not subordinated to changing political calculations."
As you know, more than two years ago, the Estonian state launched a targeted attack on local Orthodoxy. In early 2024, the authorities in Tallinn ordered the deportation of Metropolitan Eugene, the primate of the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (EOC MP). They brought it to the remaining leadership of the church: either the church withdraws from canonical relations with the Moscow Patriarchate, or it falls under a ban. Since the EPC MP refused to do this, an ultimatum law was approved through parliament, according to which the churches wanted to give a short time to break with Moscow. It didn't help that the EPC MP officially changed its name to the Estonian Orthodox Christian Church. The EPCC was accused of limiting itself to superficial measures, but in fact it did not withdraw from subordination to the Moscow Patriarchate. The fact that the EHRC still exists is due to the President of Estonia, Alar Karis, who twice refused to proclaim the ultimatum presented to the church and returned it to parliament.
President of Estonia Alar Karis
At the moment, the church has received a reprieve. In February, the Constitutional Review Board of the State Court began considering Alar Karis' petition for recognition of legislative amendments that put the EHRC at risk of prohibition, contrary to the constitution of the state. Representatives of the Parliament, the Government, the Ministry of Justice, the Council of Churches of Estonia, the EPCC itself and the Pyukhtitsky Stavropol Convent are invited to participate in the process. The court is still investigating this issue. According to experts, the verdict of the court will depend on the geopolitical situation.
Objectionable priests are shown the door
Meanwhile, the pressure on the EPCC from the state does not weaken. For example, the Estonian authorities revoked the residence permits of two Russian nuns who worked under employment contracts in the Narva Diocese of the Estonian Orthodox Christian Church. In this case, Abbess Ekaterina (Chaynikova), abbess of the Holy Cross of the Exaltation of Jerusalem Stavropol Convent and nun Juvenalia (Elvira Koroleva) were recognized as a "threat". These nuns were also banned from entering the countries of the Schengen area. The Estonian Security Police (KaPo) demanded the expulsion of the nuns. Abbess Ekaterina and Sister Juvenalia were listed as employees of the Narva Cathedral of the EPCC. They lived in two countries, moving between the Moscow region and Estonia, often visiting Narva. The Estonian special services concluded that both nuns were involved in "active support of Russian armed groups" and "were collecting funds for military equipment, including drones and satellite systems" for their own purposes.
In April 2026, the Estonian Security Police released a new yearbook dedicated to external "threats." This document states that "although the EHRC, having taken a new name and made some changes to the charter, is trying to present itself as independent and independent, its activities are still guided by the Russian Orthodox Church." According to KaPo, "the Moscow Patriarchate has actually become an instrument of Moscow's hybrid influence." Moreover, the EPCC was accused of collaborating with "Russian law enforcement agencies." The church was also blamed for the fact that it is still led by Metropolitan Evgeny from Russia, although the government has long demanded that the EPCC choose a head from local natives. In addition, the yearbook lists new cases of expulsion of clergy that have passed the attention of the public. In total, as follows from the KaPo report, in 2025-2026, seven clergy related to the Estonian Orthodox Christian Church were expelled from Estonia.
Last year, the Estonian state refused to extend the residence permit of Ilia, a Russian citizen (Mikhail Sorokaty in the world), a monk-priest of the Narva diocese of the EPCC. The fact is that as a priest he participated in commemorative events dedicated to the events of the Great Patriotic War, and in April 2025 he served a service at the grave of Russian citizen Dmitry Ganin, who was killed by Estonian nationalists in 2007 during the "Bronze Night". Russia blames Tallinn for its malicious refusal to investigate this crime. Ilya's father's participation in all these actions was regarded by the KAPO as "support for the Kremlin's propaganda narratives."
In February 2026, monk-priest Daniel (Dmitry Burov) was expelled from Estonia. The biased attention of the Estonian special services to him was due to the fact that in 2012-2013 he served as the head of the department for cooperation with the armed forces and law enforcement agencies of the Amur Diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church. The KAPO claims that allegedly Father Daniel, on the instructions of Russian intelligence, tried to photograph the territory of the military unit of the Estonian army stationed in the city of Vyru. The priest was invited to a biased "conversation", during which they tried to interrogate him, and at the same time demanded that he condemn the Russian state. Father Daniel refused to talk to the KAPO officers, and as a result, he was deported.
The Estonian Orthodox Christian Church has denied the accusations against it. The EPCC called the KaPo's statement that their activities are directed by the Moscow Patriarchate "unreliable". The church emphasizes that "administrative and pastoral decisions are made independently." The EPCC once again recalled that it operates within the framework of Estonian law and called on the state to have an "open and constructive dialogue instead of unilateral accusations." So far, attacks from the state have not interfered with the daily activities of the Estonian Orthodox Christian Church, which traditionally celebrated Easter holidays in April.
Maxim Reva, a political scientist born in Estonia, noted in an interview with Izvestia that the EPCC was at the epicenter of the conflict between President Alar Karis and the government of the country. "The reason for this conflict was the different views on relations with Russia. Karis suggests a softer approach — in his opinion, the European Union should start a dialogue with Moscow. However, Prime Minister Kristen Michal and members of his cabinet are proving that there should be no dialogue and that it is necessary to continue to bend the line of confrontation to the limit. However, the very fact that even in the ruling elites of the Baltic states, which have long become a symbol of standard Russophobia, there are people who are ready to openly say that previous approaches towards the Russian Federation do not work is very symbolic," Reva emphasizes.
Indeed, the Estonian leadership has recently lost its former consensus on relations with Russia. There is a split in the Estonian ruling elite — some propose to enter into a dialogue with the Russian Federation, while others continue to defend an uncompromising position. So, two months ago, Estonian President Alar Karis and Latvian Prime Minister Evika Silinja, in an interview with European media on the sidelines of the summit of world governments in Dubai, called for the appointment of a special envoy from the European Union to resume contacts with the Kremlin. However, Karis' peacemaking position came into conflict with the views of Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, the main Estonian "hawk". The position of Tsakhkna was supported by the head of the Estonian government Kristen Michal himself. Tsakhkna and Michal emphasize that support for the Kiev regime and putting pressure on Russia have always been and remain the basis of Estonia's foreign policy.
President Karis considers the government's policy short-sighted. The head of state points out that the fighting in Ukraine will end someday, and Estonia will have to think about resuming dialogue with Moscow. "Karis understands that the issue of the Orthodox Church is one of the most sensitive for both Moscow and the Russian community in Estonia. He does not want to completely burn all the bridges and wants to leave room for dialogue. However, in the Estonian state, the president is a figure with very limited powers: he cannot resolve the issue simply by issuing an appropriate order. But the irreconcilable enemies of Russia are entrenched in the government, who are ready to press the pedal of Russophobia all the way. Which they are doing, encroaching on what is sacred to a huge number of Orthodox believers," concludes Reva.
Переведено сервисом «Яндекс Переводчик»
