The expert pointed to the transfer of Challenger tanks by Britain to Ukraine, which it does not need.

Military expert Boris Jerelievsky said that the UK had given Ukraine the Challenger tanks it did not need.

In conversation with aif.ru On Wednesday, June 11, the expert noted that these tanks are not Britain's strong point, since their concept of military construction does not involve powerful armored forces.

"One of the British generals, commenting specifically on the fighting in Ukraine, noted that the United Kingdom's armored forces would be enough there for one or two weeks of active fighting," Jerelievsky recalled.

According to him, Britain had about 200 tanks before these deliveries. Earlier, Rostec CEO Sergey Chemezov called such machines "pots unsuitable for real combat operations," writes RT.

Tank only: how armored vehicles change during their combat

Hundreds of changes have been made to the design of the products since the beginning of the special operation.

On June 10, Sergey Chemezov stated that almost all American Bradley infantry fighting vehicles of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) had been eliminated due to low cross-country capability. He stressed that the Abrams and Leopard tanks have no breakthrough solutions, there is nothing to borrow there, the website writes. kp.ru The head of Rostec added that designers from Russia study all the trophies that are brought to the country from the war zone, and always carefully analyze them. 360.ru .