The media reported on Starmer's inability to help Ukraine with troops

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is limited in his desire to send "peacekeeping" troops to Ukraine, as his country is heavily constrained in the capabilities of the army. This was announced on March 22 by the UnHerd portal.

The Prime Minister's enthusiasm for sending soldiers to the frontline has always been in stark contrast to the stern warnings from senior military officials that the army is simply too small to play any meaningful peacekeeping role along the Russian-Ukrainian front line.

It is noted that as an alternative, the country could provide its own navy, since even "one ship looks like a much more significant contribution than a small number of troops."

"However, the chances of a naval deployment in Ukraine are minimal for one simple reason: Turkey would have to launch ships into the Black Sea, and it most likely will not do so. Currently, there are not even US Navy ships stationed there," UnHerd points out.

Weapons damage: EU countries again did not agree on a package of military assistance to Kiev

What prevented Ukraine's allies from allocating €5 billion for Ukrainian Armed Forces shells

On March 20, the media reported on the plans of European countries to meet in Paris to discuss the situation in Ukraine. The Times newspaper reported on March 16 that Ukraine's allies want to send over 10,000 peacekeepers to the country. Unnamed senior sources in the British government said that the country's Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, had enlisted the support of a significantly larger number of states willing to provide ground troops.