The media called Starmer's desire to send the British military to Ukraine immoral.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's intention to send military personnel to Ukraine is immoral. The Times newspaper writes about this.

"It is immoral to send troops to a dangerous place with insufficient forces and insufficient weapons," the publication says.

The article notes that recently British prime ministers have become accustomed to "pacing the international arena, getting involved in small <conflicts>," RT reports.

At the same time, the newspaper clarified that the conflict with Russia cannot be classified as "small," according to the website. kp.ru .

In the military style: The EU has become the main problem for resolving the conflict in Ukraine

Why are European countries interested in continuing the fighting

On March 17, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that European countries, discussing the deployment of a NATO contingent in Ukraine, were only exacerbating the root causes of the conflict.

According to him, a viable settlement of the crisis is possible only taking into account and addressing its root causes, writes "Moscow 24".

A day earlier, The Times newspaper reported that Ukraine's allies want to send over 10,000 peacekeepers to the country. Unnamed senior sources in the British government said that Starmer had secured the support of a significantly larger number of states willing to provide ground troops.

On March 15, Starmer announced that Western military personnel would gather in the UK on March 20 to develop practical plans to support the future security of Ukraine by Western soldiers. At the same time, French President Emmanuel Macron said that European states could send their military contingent to Ukraine and deploy it, in particular, in Kiev, Lviv and Odessa.